6 min read

How to Secure Cloud-Native Infrastructure in the Energy Sector

How to Secure Cloud-Native Infrastructure in the Energy Sector

Cloud-native adoption is accelerating across the energy sector, but security hasn’t kept pace. In 2024, the average cost of a data breach in energy reached $4.78 million, according to IBM Security. That number reflects real operational and financial damage.

Energy workloads now span containers, APIs, serverless functions, and hybrid environments. Traditional defenses no longer protect today’s workloads. Your security strategy must align with how threats now move across cloud-native infrastructure.

This guide is built for IT and cloud leaders tasked with securing critical infrastructure in a modern cloud-native environment. It covers the architectural shifts, risk patterns, and practical security strategies required to protect cloud infrastructure with confidence.

Understanding Cloud-Native Energy Infrastructure

Cloud-native systems are built to run in dynamic, scalable cloud environments. In energy, this shift powers real-time analytics, predictive maintenance, and rapid deployment across critical infrastructure.

The core stack includes containerized microservices, serverless functions, APIs, and CI/CD pipelines. Kubernetes often orchestrates these components across multiple cloud platforms. This modular design enables faster iteration and higher resilience.

But energy environments aren’t greenfield. Most organizations must connect cloud-native applications to legacy OT, control systems, and on-prem infrastructure. That friction introduces risk, especially if security tools, policies, and teams aren’t aligned across the full stack.

Traditional security models assume a static perimeter. Cloud-native systems demand adaptive controls that follow workloads. Without strong posture management and application security, cloud misconfigurations and exposed services create immediate vulnerability.

Security Risks in Cloud-Native Energy Environments

Cloud-native environments introduce a fundamentally different risk profile for energy organizations. As systems become more distributed, security risks multiply across APIs, containers, pipelines, and cloud resources. Visibility and control become harder to maintain at scale.

1. Misconfigurations and Excessive Permissions
Misconfigurations remain the leading cause of cloud security incidents. Over-permissioned IAM roles, exposed management interfaces, and unsecured Kubernetes services can allow unauthorized access to critical services. In energy environments, a single configuration error can expose operational data or disrupt essential systems. Without consistent security policies and posture management, these issues persist across deployments.

2. Runtime Blind Spots
Many security solutions focus on build-time checks and miss what happens after deployment. Cloud workloads change constantly, making static controls ineffective. Without runtime monitoring, security teams struggle to detect abnormal behavior, policy violations, or attempts to access secure data in real time. This gap limits the ability to respond before damage spreads.

3. Supply Chain and Dependency Risk
These applications often depend on open-source components, container images, and third-party providers. Without focused dependency management, upstream vulnerabilities often slip through undetected. Traditional security tools rarely inspect dependencies deeply enough to catch these risks early.

4. Inconsistent Controls Across Environments
Energy organizations often operate across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Security controls applied in development may not carry over into production. Differences between cloud providers, legacy systems, and operational technology introduce security gaps that remain invisible without centralized security posture management.

Together, these risks increase the likelihood of security incidents in cloud-native energy systems. Addressing them requires security tools and practices designed for dynamic cloud-native architectures, not retrofitted traditional controls. Serverless Solutions offers Managed Security Services tailored to help energy organizations mitigate these risks with full-stack visibility and control.

Core Security Principles for Cloud-Native Energy Systems

Securing cloud-native energy systems requires a shift in mindset. Traditional security models built for static, perimeter-based networks fall short in fast-changing cloud native environments. These principles provide the foundation for protecting infrastructure, applications, and data across distributed systems.

Zero Trust for Distributed Workloads

In cloud-native architecture, trust boundaries are no longer tied to the network perimeter. Zero Trust requires continuous identity verification and access validation at every layer of the system. Every service request, including internal traffic between containers or microservices, must be authenticated and authorized based on least privilege. This reduces lateral movement and helps protect critical infrastructure from internal threats.

Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Strong IAM practices are essential for reducing cloud security risks. Security engineers must enforce fine-grained permissions tied to specific workloads, roles, or teams. Avoid wildcard access, rotate credentials frequently, and audit policies across cloud service providers to prevent drift. In cloud native environments, IAM becomes the first layer of security posture enforcement.

Encryption and Full-Stack Observability

Encryption must be applied to data in transit and at rest using current protocols such as TLS 1.2 or higher and customer-managed keys. Observability is equally critical. Teams should implement logging, tracing, and telemetry that capture context across workloads and services. Effective observability enables early detection of cyber threats and suspicious behavior, giving security teams time to respond before damage occurs.

Policy-as-Code and Automated Guardrails

Embedding security policies into deployment pipelines is a key practice for securing cloud native applications. Tools like Open Policy Agent (OPA), Kyverno, or Terraform Sentinel allow teams to codify controls as part of infrastructure-as-code. Automated checks can enforce best practices, validate configurations, and prevent drift during deployment. These controls should be standardized across environments to reduce security gaps and human error.

Securing Every Layer of the Cloud-Native Stack

Securing a cloud-native setup means addressing vulnerabilities at every layer of the infrastructure. From compute to code to operations, each level introduces distinct risks. A generic, perimeter-based strategy won’t protect modern workloads across distributed cloud native environments. Security must be embedded into the architecture—by design, not after deployment.

Infrastructure Layer

The infrastructure layer supports everything else. This is where poorly segmented networks or unscanned container images can expose critical services. To reduce the attack surface, apply Kubernetes network policies to isolate services by function and risk level. Disable unused ports and enforce strict ingress controls to limit exposure. Avoid default configurations and ensure node-level security settings block unnecessary access. Even in virtual machines or hybrid cloud platforms, every infrastructure component must be hardened to support resilient, secure workloads.

Application Layer

Cloud-native applications evolve fast, but speed cannot come at the expense of security. This layer demands embedded controls throughout the software delivery pipeline. Require code reviews and validate builds with signed artifacts to ensure code integrity. Enforce schema validation and use API gateways to restrict traffic and reduce surface area. Secure-by-default policies must be applied across pipelines to protect your cloud environment from injection attacks, code tampering, and misrouted data flows.

Operations Layer

Without strong operational controls, even well-architected systems remain vulnerable. Centralized logging, telemetry, and real-time alerting form the backbone of a resilient cloud security posture. Teams must continuously validate detection logic, run incident response simulations, and automate checks against configuration drift. Serverless Solutions is a Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP) focused on securing cloud-native infrastructure and applications across every layer of the stack.

Regulatory and Compliance Considerations in Energy

Cloud-native security in the energy sector isn’t optional. Regulatory frameworks now require organizations to secure infrastructure in the cloud with the same rigor applied to on-prem systems.

Standards like NERC CIP, ISO 27001, and IEC 62443 mandate controls for access, logging, encryption, and response. Cloud-native environments can meet these requirements, but only if properly configured. For example, enforcing fine-grained IAM and full activity logging satisfies core NERC CIP-007-6 controls across both cloud and legacy systems.

To stay compliant, security teams must codify policies and integrate them into the deployment pipeline. Policy-as-code ensures enforcement before infrastructure is provisioned and flags violations early. Cloud-native security tools should also automate checks for misconfigurations, insecure access paths, and unencrypted services.

Compliance in cloud native environments is not a one-time task. It must be continuous, automated, and built into your architecture from the start.

Challenges of Securing Legacy Integration

Energy organizations rarely operate in pure cloud-native environments. Most still rely on operational technology (OT) like SCADA systems housed in on-prem data centers or edge locations. Meanwhile, analytics and automation platforms increasingly live in the cloud. This split creates serious security challenges.

Legacy systems were not designed to handle cloud-native security requirements. When connected to modern platforms, they often introduce gaps that attackers can exploit. The key risks include:

  • Lack of support for modern encryption and authentication
    Many legacy assets don’t support TLS, token-based access, or federated identity.
  • Limited visibility and telemetry
    Without proper logging or monitoring, it’s difficult to detect abnormal behavior or configuration drift.
  • Flat network architectures
    Older OT networks are often wide open internally, making lateral movement easy once breached.
  • Direct exposure to cloud platforms
    Connecting OT systems to cloud services without proper isolation increases the risk of compromise.

To address these issues, security teams must enforce segmentation, use identity-aware proxies, and avoid direct OT-to-cloud communication. One-way data diodes, scoped API layers, and policy-based access controls help contain risk. A secure cloud strategy must account for legacy integration as a primary design requirement.

Organizational Readiness and Culture Shift

Securing cloud-native environments isn’t just a technical challenge. It demands new roles, workflows, and team dynamics. Without organizational alignment, even the best cloud security strategy fails in practice.

In most energy organizations, IT and OT teams still operate in silos. In a cloud native setup, those boundaries need to break down. Security must work side by side with developers and infrastructure teams. Not as gatekeepers, but as integrated collaborators.

DevSecOps should be the norm. Security engineers belong inside delivery teams, not outside them. Upskilling is also critical. Both cloud engineers and legacy operations staff need training in security tools, shared practices, and platform-specific risks.

Governance must evolve to reflect how cloud-native applications are built and run. Workloads are decentralized, fast-moving, and ephemeral. Your security platform must enforce controls automatically and provide visibility across every cloud environment.

Take Control of Your Cloud-Native Security Posture

Modernizing energy infrastructure comes with risk, but also with the opportunity to rebuild security from the ground up. Cloud-native systems demand more than reactive controls. They require intentional design, cross-functional execution, and continuous alignment between teams and tools.

Every layer of your architecture matters. From Kubernetes to CI/CD pipelines to hybrid OT integrations, security must be built in, not bolted on. The organizations that lead will be those that treat cloud-native security as a strategic advantage.

To evaluate where your security posture stands and what needs to change, request an Architecture Review from Serverless Solutions. Our experts help energy teams secure cloud-native environments with precision and confidence.

Modern Security Challenges for Distributed Workforces

3 min read

Modern Security Challenges for Distributed Workforces

Remote and hybrid work have fundamentally changed how companies operate — and how attackers target them. Today’s workforce is more distributed, more...

Read More

1 min read

SaaS Security Posture Management Expanded in Microsoft Defender

Microsoft is enhancing how SaaS-based applications are secured and protected with the latest updates to Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps. SaaS...

Read More

1 min read

Microsoft Security Solutions Cover More Clouds

Microsoft is now the only major cloud provider to offer security solutions that span the top three major cloud providers in the world – Azure, AWS,...

Read More