Serverless Solutions Insights

Shadow AI: Things to Consider When Your Executive Team is Feeling Vibe-y

Written by Admin | Feb 6, 2026 6:12:22 PM

shadow‑AI

noun

  1. The unsanctioned use of artificial intelligence tools or applications within an organization, typically by employees using AI systems (such as generative AI models or chatbots) without the knowledge, approval, or oversight of the IT or security department.

vibe coding

noun

  1. An AI‑assisted software development practice in which a developer describes a task or project in natural language and a large language model (LLM) generates the source code, often without the developer reviewing or manually editing it.

Technology has never been more accessible. Every day, business leaders spin up homegrown automations, low code tools offer quick fixes to small problems, and employees feel increasingly empowered to take technological leaps they wouldn’t have imagined a decade ago. This is both exciting and risky.

Everything in moderation, right?

The once‑intimidating barrier of writing code can now be crossed in seconds using tools like Codex, Cursor, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, and many others. The ability to “wield tech” has never been easier—but the responsibility to wield it safely has never been greater.

And look, we get it: vibes matter. There’s a certain satisfaction in rolling up your sleeves and getting things done. It feels wholesome. It feels American. But we want to gently caution our well‑intentioned builders against spinning up rogue AI solutions inside an enterprise environment.

Creating AI‑generated code in a silo—especially when done by a business lead without central IT oversight—poses significant risks. While it may speed up prototyping, it often results in technical debt, security exposures, and operational failures.

We’re seeing more of this every day, so we put together a concise outline of key considerations. This isn’t exhaustive—how could it be, when the landscape changes daily— but it highlights some of the major risks and realities.

 

1. Ability & Risks of Siloed AI Code Creation

    • High Velocity, Low Quality: LLMs can generate working code fast, but it’s often bloated, poorly documented, or inefficient.
    • “Shadow AI” Exposure: Unvetted tools bypass security controls and create hidden risks.
    • Lack of Organizational Context: AI can’t see your broader architecture, standards, or business logic, so code that works in isolation may break when integrated.
    • “Rubber‑Stamp” Review: Less experienced developers may trust AI output too easily, causing unnecessary rework and technical debt.

 

2. Challenges in Enterprise Integration

    • Legacy Incompatibility: AI is great with greenfield work but struggles with older, complex systems.
    • Data Silos: AI built without access to unified data can produce fragmented or biased insights.
    • Missing MLOps: Production AI requires continuous monitoring, deployment processes, and retraining—things siloed projects rarely include.

 

3. Security and Compliance Risks

    • High Vulnerability Rate: Nearly half (45–51%) of AI‑generated suggestions contain security flaws.
    • Systemic Vulnerabilities: AI may replicate insecure patterns across multiple systems simultaneously.
    • Data Leakage/IP Loss: Teams may unknowingly paste proprietary code or sensitive data into public models.
    • Compliance Gaps: AI tools don’t inherently understand GDPR, CCPA, or internal compliance obligations.

 

4. Repeatability, Consistency, and IT Support

    • Low Reproducibility: If creators can’t explain how the code works, it’s difficult to troubleshoot or improve.
    • Inconsistent Output: Different prompts yield different answers, making standardized experiences difficult.
    • IT Support Burden: When something breaks, IT inherits a system they didn’t build and don’t understand.

 

5. Best Practices to Mitigate Risk

    • Human‑in‑the‑Loop: Require expert review before any AI‑generated code reaches production.
    • Centralized Governance: Shift from siloed experiments to centrally managed, secure AI infrastructure.
    • Guardrail Tools: Leverage DevSecOps scanning tailored for AI‑generated code.
    • Continuous Monitoring: Treat AI models as evolving systems that need regular oversight to prevent drift.

Bottom Line

AI unlocks enormous potential—but siloed, unmanaged use creates high‑cost, low‑reliability, high‑risk outcomes. Organizations need a production‑first mindset where AI development aligns with IT governance, not outside it.

Every organization needs an enterprise AI usage policy.

“Shadow IT” has been around forever — business units building their own solutions without looping in the official IT team until the last minute.

Shadow AI is the same, just dramatically faster and far riskier.

Every organization needs an active plan to:

• Prepare for AI adoption
• Publish clear, accessible policies
• Distribute guidance across the org
• Govern and monitor AI usage

If you need help getting started, talk to a trusted advisor.

If you don’t have one, reach out to Serverless Solutions. We’re helping clients navigate this every day.